Conference

We’re speaking at WTC Montreal

May 17–21

Damage Mapping workflow

Document ground condition deterioration, support-system damage, and rehabilitation requirements in 3D. Prioritize what to fix, in what order, with a record that holds up through rehabilitation cycles over years.

Decision anchoring

Ground doesn't stay static.

Ground doesn't stay static. Support systems age, loads shift, and excavations respond. For most mining operations, damage mapping is a critical routine. When damage goes undocumented, rehabilitation gets prioritized by the loudest voice rather than the worst condition. When it's documented sporadically, the pattern of deterioration stays invisible until it becomes a significant risk or something fails.

How systematically data was captured can significantly impact how effective the rehab program is.

The manual gap today

Damage mapping can be triggered by an incident

Damage mapping can be triggered by an incident, a near-miss, or a visual inspection that picks up an obvious problem. The records are typically photos, notes in notepads, and conversations between the geotechnical engineer and shift superintendent. Scheduling rehabilitation competes with the pace of production and availability of equipment.

It gets done when it becomes urgent, not when it's optimal.

The Workflow Stages

The connected workflow

Five stages. Two products. One connected workflow from face to decision.

Stage 1 - Plan - Lithos

Define the damage-mapping

Define the damage-mapping regions and cycle using starred locations. Determine which locations and which support systems need to be monitored. Configure Lithos capture profile for damage-specific annotation (support condition and ground support types).

Stage 2 - Capture - Lithos

Observe underground

Capture a 3D scan of the affected area and compare against historical data while underground. HD photo annotation of damaged features. Classification of damage type, severity, and urgency. Time-stamped, georeferenced, observer-attributed.

Stage 3 - Map - Strata

Damage records sync to Strata

Damage records sync to Strata where data is georeferenced and compared against previous captures where available.

Stage 4 - DECIDE - strata

Triage rehabilitation

Share reports documenting severity, urgency, and location to drive the work that needs to be completed. Engineering teams can use the current damage record compared to the historical record to prioritize support-system rehabilitation.

Stage 5 - SHARE - Strata

Export the damage record

Export the damage record for rehabilitation planning, safety reviews, and reconciliation. Feed the damage pattern back into geotechnical assessment workflows and mine planning.

The Platform

How Lithos and Strata run the workflow

Lithos · data capture

Underground data capture

Document deteriorating ground conditions and ground support damage in 3D over time. Review current conditions to historical data captured in the same location.

Strata · plan meets reality

Where plan meets reality

Damage records compared against historical datasets from previous captures. Identify visible patterns and changes over time. Generate reports based on urgency and severity to prioritize rehab.

What you get

Damage records with damage type

Damage records with damage type, severity, location, and timestamped. Reconciliation datasets comparing today's conditions vs.historical conditions. A persistent damage history that helps prioritize rehab work and risk management.

Frequently asked questions.

Data captured in Lithos flows directly into the Grounded platform, where teams can review conditions, generate reports, and align on decisions.

How is this different from Geotechnical Mapping?
Is this only for mining?
Related Workflows

Used across key workflows.

See how structural mapping connects to the broader GroundedAI platform.

See damage mapping run as a routine.

Walk through a full damage-mapping cycle with a mining scenario.